Logo-japid
J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 2026;18(1): 11-19.
doi: 10.34172/japid.026.3806
  Abstract View: 77
  PDF Download: 19

Original Article

Assessment of gingival characteristics by professional versus smartphone imaging

Mohan Kumar Pasupuleti 1* ORCID logo, Gurramkonda Sirisha 2 ORCID logo, Gabu Pujitha 2 ORCID logo, Gautami Subhadra Penmetsa 1 ORCID logo, Supraja Salwaji 3 ORCID logo, Nissi Gurindapalli 4 ORCID logo

1 Department of Periodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Vishnupur, Bhimavaram, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh, India
2 Vishnu Dental College, Vishnupur, Bhimavaram, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh, India
3 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Vishnu Dental College, Vishnupur, Bhimavaram, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh, India
4 Department of Orthodontics, Vishnu Dental College, Vishnupur, Bhimavaram, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh, India
*Corresponding Author: Mohan Kumar Pasupuleti, Email: mosups@gmail.com

Abstract

Background. Accurate evaluation of gingival health requires understanding inflammation as a sign of disease activity or healing. Only a few studies have examined the gingiva in depth using non-invasive imaging techniques. Therefore, this study assessed the accuracy of evaluating gingival parameters using professional (Canon EOS 1300D, Canon Inc., Japan) and smartphone (iPhone 15 Pro, Apple Inc., USA) cameras, with pre- and post-treatment photographs.

Methods. Thirty-four patients with gingivitis were selected, and photographs were captured using professional and smartphone cameras. Gingival parameters were examined using pictures of the maxillary anterior region taken at distances of 24, 28, and 32 cm from the examination site. All the images were evaluated using the free ImageJ software (US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA) with an accuracy of 0.01 mm. The paired t-test was used to compare gingival color values and clinical measurements. A P value of<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results. There were no significant differences in gingival parameters between images taken using either professional or smartphone photography. The results showed no significant differences in gingival color assessment at 24-, 28-, and 32-cm distances between the two images.

Conclusion. Digital images obtained with DSLR and smartphone cameras showed comparable accuracy for gingival parameter measurements at the tested distances.


First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 78

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download: 19

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Submitted: 15 Mar 2025
Revision: 09 Oct 2025
Accepted: 10 Oct 2025
ePublished: 27 Nov 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)