Logo-japid
Submitted: 10 Jul 2017
Accepted: 11 Aug 2017
ePublished: 09 Oct 2017
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Periodontol Implant Dent. 2017;9(2): 58-62.
doi: 10.15171/jpid.2017.010
  Abstract View: 205
  PDF Download: 191

Research Article

Comparative evaluation of coronally positioned flap with or without using a collagen barrier membrane for root coverage procedures: A clinical study

Anup Cholepati 1*, S.S. Doiphode 2, Motilal Jangid 3

1 Reader, Department of Periodontics, CSMSS Dental College and Hospital, Kanchanwadi, Aurangabad, India
2 Guide and Professor, Department of Periodontics, CSMSS Dental College and Hospital, Kanchanwadi, Aurangabad, India
3 Reader, Department of Periodontics. SD Dental College and Hospital, Parbhani, India
*Corresponding Author; E-mail: dr.anupcholepatil@gmail.com

Abstract

Gingival recession is defined as displacement of gingival margin apical to cementoenamel junction. Over the years gingival recession has been treated by a number of surgical techniques. Conventional mucogingival procedures such as the laterally positioned flap, free gingival graft, connective tissue graft and coronally positioned flap have been shown to be relatively successful in achieving root coverage. Gingival tissue regeneration (GTR) based root coverage has emerged as an alternative treatment because it demonstrates histologically new attachment formation. The aim of this study was to compare coronally positioned flap procedures in gingival recession defects with or without using a collagen barrier membrane.
First Name
 
Last Name
 
Email Address
 
Comments
 
Security code


Abstract View: 205

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 191

Your browser does not support the canvas element.