Logo-japid
Submitted: 02 Jun 2015
Accepted: 05 Jul 2015
ePublished: 08 Oct 2018
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Periodontol Implant Dent. 2015;7(2): 44-49.
doi: 10.15171/jpid.2015.009
  Abstract View: 238
  PDF Download: 146

Research Article

Efficacy of Double Pedicle Graft with and without PRGF in Treating Cl I and Cl II Gingival Recessions

Nader Abolfazli 1, Afsoon Asadollahi 2*, Masoumeh Faramarzi 3, Fariba Saleh Saber 4

1 Assotiate Professor, Dental and Periodontal Research Center, Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Postgraduate Student, Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4 Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
*Corresponding Author; E-mail: afsoon.asadollahi@gmail.com

Abstract

Background and aims. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of double pedicle graft (DPG) with and without plasma rich in growth factor (PRGF) in the treatment of Miller's Cl I and II gingival recessions.

Materials and methods. Thirty-two bilateral buccal gingival Miller’s Cl I and II recessions were selected. Sixteen of the recessions were treated with DPG and PRGF (test group). The remaining sixteen recessions were treated with DPG (control group). The clinical parameters, including clinical probing depth (CPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), recession depth (RD), recession width (RW) and keratinized gingiva width (KGW), were measured at baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months later. Data were analyzed with paired t-test.

Results. After 6 months, both groups exhibited a significant improvement in all the criteria mentioned above. However, none of the groups showed significant differences in pocket depths after 6 months. At the end of the study there were significant improvements in recession depths and widths and clinical attachment levels and keratinized gingiva width between test and control groups

Conclusion. The method using DPG+PRGF resulted in more favorable clinical outcomes than only DPG. 

Keywords: Recession, double papilla graft, PRGF
First Name
 
Last Name
 
Email Address
 
Comments
 
Security code


Abstract View: 238

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 146

Your browser does not support the canvas element.