Submitted: 21 Apr 2014
First published online: 23 Jun 2014
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - FireFox Plugin)

J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 2014;6(2):35-39.
doi: 10.15171/jpid.2014.007
  Abstract View: 43
  PDF Download: 114

Research Article

Platelet-rich Plasma with Scaling and Root Planing: A Double-blind Split-mouth Randomized Study 

Ashish Agarwal 1 * , Narinder Dev Gupta 2

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Bareilly, India
2 Professor, Department of Periodontology, D. Z. A. Dental College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India
*Corresponding Author; E-mail: Email: drashish.aag@gmail.com

Abstract

Background and aims. Along with conventional periodontal therapy, subginigval application of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) may provide more effective improvements in clinical parameters due to the presence of multiple growth factors. The aim of this double-blind, split-mouth, randomized study was to evaluate the adjunctive use of PRP with scaling and root planing (SRP) in the treatment of chronic periodontitis.

Materials and methods. A total of 87 non-smokers suffering from moderate to severe chronic periodontitis were selected. Parameters were probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), plaque index (PI) and modified bleeding index (mBI). After full-mouth SRP the sites were randomly divided into experimental sites receiving subgingival application of autologous PRP and controls treated with placebo gel. Measurements were recorded at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. Paired t-test was used to compare response to treatment between the two sites.

Results. Statistically significant changes in parameters were seen in both groups from baseline to 6 months. Inter-group comparison revealed significantly more clinical attachment gain for the experimental group (P>0.05). The mean CAL gain was 2.40±0.4 mm for control sites and 2.68±0.5 mm for experimental sites.

Conclusion. This study supports the use of PRP during nonsurgical debridement of periodontal pockets measured 6 months after SRP.

 
First name
 
Last name
 
Email address
 
Comments
 
Security code


Article Viewed: 43

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Downloaded: 114

Your browser does not support the canvas element.