Logo-japid
J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent. 2024;16(2): 133-138.
doi: 10.34172/japid.2024.015
  Abstract View: 49
  PDF Download: 21

Research Article

Biological behavior of mesenchymal stem cells on two types of commercial dermal scaffolds: An in vitro study

Omid Moghaddas 1 ORCID logo, Ehsan Seyedjafari 2 ORCID logo, Donya Sadat Mahoutchi 3* ORCID logo

1 Periodontist, Private Practice, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Biotechnology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Department of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Donya Sadat Mahoutchi, Email: dent2sm@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background. Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has been introduced as an alternative to autogenous grafts. This study assessed the biological behavior of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) on two types of commercial ADM scaffolds.

Methods. The present in vitro study investigated the behavior of MSCs cultured on scaffold type I CenoDerm® (Tissue Regeneration Corporation) and type II Acellular Dermis (Iranian Tissue Product Co.) as the test groups and an empty well plate as the control group (n=78). Cell attachment was assessed after 12 hours of incubation using 6,4-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining and methyl thiazole tetrazolium (MTT) assay. Cell proliferation was assessed using the MTT assay at 24- and 84-hour and 7-day intervals. Cell morphology was also assessed under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) at 24 hours. MTT assay and DAPI staining were repeated for five samples in all the three groups. Mann-Whitney, ANOVA, and post hoc Tukey tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results. The DAPI staining and MTT assay showed similar results concerning cell attachment between all the groups at 12 hours (P=0.4). At 24 hours, cell proliferation was significantly higher in scaffold groups (P<0.001). At seven days, the lowest cell proliferation was noted in the scaffold II group, with a significant difference between the groups (P=0.01). At 24 hours, cell expansion was greater in the control group, followed by the scaffold I group.

Conclusion. Both scaffolds were similar in MSC attachment, but scaffold I appeared superior to scaffold II in terms of MSC proliferation and morphology in vitro.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 50

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 21

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 20 Jan 2024
Accepted: 30 Jul 2024
ePublished: 11 Aug 2024
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)