Logo-japid
J Periodontol Implant Dent. 2014;6(1): 8-12.
doi: 10.15171/jpid.2014.002
  Abstract View: 622
  PDF Download: 598

Research Article

Comparison of Efficacy of Pain Control Using the Interseptal Injection Technique and Inferior Alveolar Block Accompanied by Long Buccal Infiltration in Mandibular Periodontal Flap Surgery

Mohammad Taghi Chitsazi 1,2, Reza Pourabbas 1,3, Adileh Shirmohammadi 1,2*, Saied Nezafati 1,4, Amin Mousavi 5

1 Dental and Periodontal Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Peiodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
3 Professor, Department of Peiodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
4 4 Associate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
5 Postgraduate Student, Department of Prosthothdontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
*Corresponding Author: *Corresponding Author; E-mail:, Email: shirmohamadia@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background and aims. Pain control ensures patient satisfaction and cooperation. This study aimed to compare the interseptal anesthetic technique (IA) as the initial injection for pain control during periodontal flap surgery with the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) accompanied by long buccal infiltration (LBI).

Materials and methods. This single-blind randomized clinical trial included 40 periodontitis patients. Pain intensity was evaluated immediately after injection and at the end of surgery. One side was chosen as the control to receive IANB accompanied by LBI and the other side as the test to receive IA. After the injection, the patients were asked to mark their reaction to the pain immediately after the injection on a visual analogue scale, which was repeated to analyze pain the day after surgery. Data were analyzed with independent-samples t-test using SPSS 13. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results. The mean pain scores immediately after injection in the control and test groups were 20.62 ± 7.62 and 21.47 ± 8.62, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (df = 78, t = −0.466, P = 0.642). Pain scores 24 hours after completion of surgery in the control and test groups were 7.97 ± 3.43, and 9.30 ± 3.24, respectively, with no significant difference (df = 78, t = −1.775, P = 0.080).

Conclusion. Based on the results, interseptal anesthetic technique was not shown to be superior to conventional injections.

Keywords: Anesthesia, injection, pain
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 623

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 598

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 15 Jan 2013
Accepted: 05 Dec 2013
ePublished: 15 Jan 2014
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)